Monday, July 28, 2008

At Home in Rocinha

In seven days I will be moving into my new home in Rocinha, a favela (slum) in Rio de Janeiro. I will be volunteering with a non-profit organization called the Two Brothers Institute, which focuses on education and community service in the favela. I will also be finishing up my last semester of undergraduate work at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, studying International Business.

I must admit I’ve been surprised at the level of opposition and worry this decision has provoked in my friends and family. On one hand I understand and acknowledge it. On the other, I think that I need to explain why I’m doing it, why I think it’s not as dangerous as it seems, and why, even if it is dangerous, it is something that I have to do.

First, a little bit on Rocinha.

Rocinha is one of the biggest and arguably most famous slums in the world. It is the setting of many well-known Brazilian films such as City of God and Tropa de Elite. Estimates of its population range very widely from 200,000 to 700,000, largely because the place is outside the jurisdiction of local government, making such records difficult to keep.

It is built on a steep, concave hillside, nestled between the two towering rock formations called, respectively, “Rock of the Two Brothers” and “Rock of Gávea.” It is also located conveniently in the midst of some of the wealthiest neighborhoods in all of Brazil; São Conrado, Leblon, Gávea, Ipanema, and Barra da Tijuca.

I say “conveniently” because Rocinha is also the headquarters of the Brazilian drug trade, which, understandably, is a robust one. Its prime location makes it a natural supplier for the wealthy neighborhoods which are always the biggest market for illicit substances.

This brisk trade gives the groups that control it not only immense amounts of money, but also power. These groups use the money to buy weapons that in any other situation would be used for war, and use the power to exert an influence on local and even state and national politics that ensures opposition to their activities will never be more than symbolic.

Why do I say all this? To show that I understand what I’m getting myself into. I understand that the situation is complicated, that allegiances are fluid and treacherous, that the logic of the place is perverted by the drugs and violence that both sustain and hold hostage the inhabitants of Rio’s favelas.

So why am I going?

First, because it’s not as dangerous as it seems. The vast majority of inhabitants of Rocinha are like you and me. They work hard, they love their families, they want to create a better future for their children, they fear violence and death. Rocinha has a huge working middle-class population which apparently finds the risks acceptable for their families, and I believe that it is these people that define the day-to-day life of the favela, even if it is punctuated from time to time by the shootouts and invasions for which it has become famous.

The media has sensationalized the myth of Rocinha to unbelievable heights. Movies portray a life-shattering combat zone that makes Iraq look like Disneyland. These seem to be the only Brazilian movies that find international success, so they keep on coming like clockwork. The news at all levels and in all mediums jumps at the chance to cover the latest police operation or drug bust or shootout or kidnapping or whatever. Newspapers sell, magazines fly off the shelves, and people across the country sit glued to their TVs, feeling better that at least their neighborhoods are not that bad.

I think it’s really important to understand, and this is true not only in Rocinha but anywhere, that “danger” is not constant. It is a function of a whole range of factors, from where you’re from to what language you speak to the color of your hair to how you walk to how you dress. Sure, if the average fannypack-brandishing tourist goes for a stroll through the Favela do Alemão at midnight, let’s just say bad things are bound to happen.

But that’s not me. I speak Portuguese fluently, well enough that people are regularly surprised that I’m a foreigner. I’ve lived in Brazil at various points throughout my life, and during the last six months I’ve lived, traveled, worked and studied on my own in the country. I’m going to be living with a normal family, working side by side with and teaching inhabitants of the neighborhood, with an organization that has deep roots in the community and is recognized and respected as a positive force for change.

And I think it goes without saying that I will not in any case be seen with any fannypacks, iphones, ipods, or digital cameras. I’m not as stupid as I look.

Second is the why.

The reasons are many, and it’s hard to focus on just one. Part of it is a desire to help people, the people that need it the most. Another reason is to experience the “real” Brazil, the side of this country that I have never seen except through the car window and on TV, and yet the side I feel is somehow a part of me, just as the two sides of the Grand Canyon are equally a part of the same chasm, each lending their own beauty and significance.

But it’s also more than that. I must admit I’m looking for adventure, which means danger. It’s not that I’m foolishly plunging headlong into every bump and hole in the road. I’m a masochist, not an idiot. But I just feel like I need a challenge, you know? I need to know what I’m made of, what I’m capable of. Modern life insists on removing everything that makes you really look in the mirror, everything that lays bare the you behind the you behind the you, everything raw and primal.

I guess maybe the reason behind the reasons is that the thing I fear the most, the thing that scares me far more than bullets and bombs ever could, is a complacent life. I see with terrifying clarity how easy it is to fall into the trap of normalcy, how easy it is to kneel at the altar of comfort and sacrifice your dreams for a little peace and quiet.

I hear Socrates’ ancient axiom, that “the unexamined life is not worth living,” as a battle cry, but also as an accusation. It haunts me. It rings in my ears as a reminder of how many times I have betrayed this belief, and how many times I will in the years to come.

The only solution, the only way I can be sure that I’m more or less on the right track, is to challenge myself, to stretch, and that I know Rocinha will do for sure.

You see? I’m as self-centered as ever.

Bookmark and Share

Friday, July 18, 2008

Quotes

"The explorer seeks the undiscovered, the traveller that which has been discovered by the mind working in history, the tourist that which has been discovered by entrepreneurship and prepared for him by the arts of mass publicity"

- Paul Fussell 

(why I never want to be considered a tourist anywhere I go)


"Hoje se fala de desenvolvimento, mas parece que se refere só à matéria, esquecendo o social, o cultural, o ambiental e o espiritual; os políticos e os cientistas só enxergam o ponto de vista econômico e tecnológico.

Desenvolvimento mesmo só existe quando é completo; quando deixa de ser uma luta pela sobrevivência, como a nossa, e passa a ser um viver em verdade, harmonia e alegria.

Para vocês, 'primitivo' é atrasado; para nós, quanto mais primitivo for o conhecimento mais avançado ele é. Por exemplo, se nós vivemos 5 mil anos é porque tínhamos uma sabedoria tradicional modelo, vivemos sem ter fome, sem ter pobres, sem ter injustiça, sem ter violência."

"These days we talk about development, but it seems like it refers only to the material, forgetting the social, the cultural, the environmental and the spiritual; the politicians and scientists can only see the economic and technological point of view."

Real development only exists when it is complete; when it stops being a fight for survival, like our development is, and becomes a life of truth, harmony, and happiness.

For you, 'primitive' is backward; for us, the more primitive the knowledge, the more advanced it is. For example, if we [Indians] lived for 5,000 years, it is because we had the perfect traditional wisdom, we lived without hunger, without poor, without injustice, without violence."

- Nhenety 

(what I was really trying to say with the previous post: that maybe in reality it is the most basic, the most primitive things that are the most "advanced" in the grand scheme of things)

Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 14, 2008

Stuff

One of the most melancholy and introspective activities for me is packing. Especially for moving - yes, I've done this a lot in recent years.  And it's not because I'm thinking of all the good memories and friends I'm leaving behind, or dreaming grand ambitions for the future life I will soon be building. No, not at all.

What really gets me thinking during these times is stuff. Digging out and packing your stuff is like a good therapist: a practical first step toward unpacking your baggage in a new and better place.

The more I undergo this process of organizing my belongings and deciding what to bring and what to leave behind, the more disdain I have for these things that I can't seem to get rid of. They are like sycophantic parasites, praising and complimenting you day and night, making you feel so good about your status and your image, and yet they know as well as you how much you need them, that they own you just as much as you own them.

Every time I do it, I keep less and less. I must admit, it's painful and unsettling. Each and every insecurity, fear, and doubt within me has a physical counterpart in the junk I carry from place to place, and getting rid of each of these symbols is both an uncomfortable reminder and a gesture of reconciliation with the self I really, truly want to be.

I think that most "things" tend to make worse the problems they are intended to solve. I mean the real problems. I have every conceivable tool and device, so that I'll never need to depend on anyone else for my needs or even desires. So we all hoard our 10 liter tubes of toothpaste and our 5 gallon mayonaise from Costco, and don't hesitate to take midnight trips to the store should we "need" anything else. 

I know this is blasphemy to our culture, but what's so wrong with depending on others? What's so bad about not having everything you need? We complain incessantly about the loss of community, the deterioration of real human relationships, while with the other hand we erect countless bubbles and barriers to block and numb and forget how painful these things are.

That's right, you heard me. Community is painful. Real friendship is painful. Love (and not just or especially romantic love) is painful. They also happen to be the only things worth "having." But no mere possession can make these things any easier, substitute them, or protect you from the risk they entail. You have to take them as they are, or not at all.

How's this for a goal: to own as little as possible. To strip down to the minimum, to the original you that entered this world with everything you really needed. Be willing to be vulnerable, to hurt, to hunger. To believe that if you bare your body to the wind and your soul to whatever life throws at you, with nothing in between, you'll not only survive - you'll thrive. 

It's just an idea.

Bookmark and Share

Monday, July 7, 2008

Family in Foz

My parents and Paloma and Marco met me in Curitiba about a week ago, and we spent a couple days in the city seeing the sights. We spent a morning in Parque Barigui, stopped by the Oscar Neimeyer Museum, and saw a beautiful sunset at the Jardim Botânico. The next day we had lunch with the Checans (the family I stayed with my first few weeks here) and saw the Primeira Igreja Batista, the church they work at. It was a great time and it was nice being able to show my family the place I'd been living for 4 months.

After an all-day drive, we arrived a few days ago in Foz do Iguaçu, the city next to Iguaçu Falls, the second biggest waterfall in the world by volume of water (after Victoria Falls in southern Africa), although it is more extensive and beautiful. It was one of those things that pictures just don't do justice, although that sure didn't prevent anyone from trying. I've never had an experience where the soundtrack to a movie just blared aloud in my head, but this time I definitely could not get the Jurassic Park theme song out of my mind. I honestly would not have been surprised if a T-Rex had come bursting out from the jungle.

The falls themselves seemed to never end, and every time you thought you had seen the best view that there could be there appeared a new and even better one. The end of the trail led us to a platform perched just above the water at the top of the falls. The sheer power of the water thundering down around us was just awe-inspiring.

Later in the day, after lunch, we went on a boat ride with Macuco Safari, a business in the park that does that. We went upriver on a speeboat, Jurassic Park once again blasting away in my head, and came to The Devil's Throat, the most spectacular waterfall in the park, with water pouring down from three sides of a massive gorge. A rainbow stretched clear from one end to the other. At the end of the ride, the driver proceeded to drive almost directly under the falls, completely soaking us several times. Imagine thousands of gallons of water falling 200 feet and hitting just a few meters from you - extreme wetness was the inevitable result.

I think the pictures can speak for themselves from here on ("Foz do Iguaçu" and "Argentina" albums in the Pictures section on the right).

Bookmark and Share